<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://nutritionj.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Nutrition Journal - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Nutrition Journal</description>
        <dc:date>2010-03-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/4/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/6/1/35" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/2/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/7/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/11" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/4/1/24">
        <title>Childhood obesity, prevalence and prevention</title>
        <description>Childhood obesity has reached epidemic levels in developed countries. Twenty five percent of children in the US are overweight and 11% are obese. Overweight and obesity in childhood are known to have significant impact on both physical and psychological health. The mechanism of obesity development is not fully understood and it is believed to be a disorder with multiple causes. Environmental factors, lifestyle preferences, and cultural environment play pivotal roles in the rising prevalence of obesity worldwide. In general, overweight and obesity are assumed to be the results of an increase in caloric and fat intake. On the other hand, there are supporting evidence that excessive sugar intake by soft drink, increased portion size, and steady decline in physical activity have been playing major roles in the rising rates of obesity all around the world. Consequently, both over-consumption of calories and reduced physical activity are involved in childhood obesity.Almost all researchers agree that prevention could be the key strategy for controlling the current epidemic of obesity. Prevention may include primary prevention of overweight or obesity, secondary prevention or prevention of weight regains following weight loss, and avoidance of more weight increase in obese persons unable to lose weight. Until now, most approaches have focused on changing the behaviour of individuals in diet and exercise. It seems, however, that these strategies have had little impact on the growing increase of the obesity epidemic. While about 50% of the adults are overweight and obese in many countries, it is difficult to reduce excessive weight once it becomes established. Children should therefore be considered the priority population for intervention strategies. Prevention may be achieved through a variety of interventions targeting built environment, physical activity, and diet. Some of these potential strategies for intervention in children can be implemented by targeting preschool institutions, schools or after-school care services as natural setting for influencing the diet and physical activity. All in all, there is an urgent need to initiate prevention and treatment of obesity in children.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/4/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Mahshid Dehghan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Noori Akhtar-Danesh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anwar Merchant</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2005, 4:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-09-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-4-24</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-09-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/6/1/35">
        <title>A survey of energy drink consumption patterns among college students</title>
        <description>Background:
Energy drink consumption has continued to gain in popularity since the 1997 debut of Red Bull, the current leader in the energy drink market. Although energy drinks are targeted to young adult consumers, there has been little research regarding energy drink consumption patterns among college students in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine energy drink consumption patterns among college students, prevalence and frequency of energy drink use for six situations, namely for insufficient sleep, to increase energy (in general), while studying, driving long periods of time, drinking with alcohol while partying, and to treat a hangover, and prevalence of adverse side effects and energy drink use dose effects among college energy drink users.
Methods:
Based on the responses from a 32 member college student focus group and a field test, a 19 item survey was used to assess energy drink consumption patterns of 496 randomly surveyed college students attending a state university in the Central Atlantic region of the United States.
Results:
Fifty one percent of participants (n = 253) reported consuming greater than one energy drink each month in an average month for the current semester (defined as energy drink user). The majority of users consumed energy drinks for insufficient sleep (67%), to increase energy (65%), and to drink with alcohol while partying (54%). The majority of users consumed one energy drink to treat most situations although using three or more was a common practice to drink with alcohol while partying (49%). Weekly jolt and crash episodes were experienced by 29% of users, 22% reported ever having headaches, and 19% heart palpitations from consuming energy drinks. There was a significant dose effect only for jolt and crash episodes.
Conclusion:
Using energy drinks is a popular practice among college students for a variety of situations. Although for the majority of situations assessed, users consumed one energy drink with a reported frequency of 1 &#8211; 4 days per month, many users consumed three or more when combining with alcohol while partying. Further, side effects from consuming energy drinks are fairly common, and a significant dose effect was found with jolt and crash episodes. Future research should identify if college students recognize the amounts of caffeine that are present in the wide variety of caffeine-containing products that they are consuming, the amounts of caffeine that they are consuming in various situations, and the physical side effects associated with caffeine consumption.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/6/1/35</link>
                <dc:creator>Brenda Malinauskas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Victor Aeby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reginald Overton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tracy Carpenter-Aeby</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kimberly Barber-Heidal</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2007, 6:35</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-6-35</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>6</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>35</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-10-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/3">
        <title>The total antioxidant content of more than 3100 foods, beverages, spices, herbs and supplements used worldwide</title>
        <description>Background:
A plant-based diet protects against chronic oxidative stress-related diseases. Dietary plants contain variable chemical families and amounts of antioxidants. It has been hypothesized that plant antioxidants may contribute to the beneficial health effects of dietary plants. Our objective was to develop a comprehensive food database consisting of the total antioxidant content of typical foods as well as other dietary items such as traditional medicine plants, herbs and spices and dietary supplements. This database is intended for use in a wide range of nutritional research, from in vitro and cell and animal studies, to clinical trials and nutritional epidemiological studies.
Methods:
We procured samples from countries worldwide and assayed the samples for their total antioxidant content using a modified version of the FRAP assay. Results and sample information (such as country of origin, product and/or brand name) were registered for each individual food sample and constitute the Antioxidant Food Table.
Results:
The results demonstrate that there are several thousand-fold differences in antioxidant content of foods. Spices, herbs and supplements include the most antioxidant rich products in our study, some exceptionally high. Berries, fruits, nuts, chocolate, vegetables and products thereof constitute common foods and beverages with high antioxidant values.
Conclusions:
This database is to our best knowledge the most comprehensive Antioxidant Food Database published and it shows that plant-based foods introduce significantly more antioxidants into human diet than non-plant foods. Because of the large variations observed between otherwise comparable food samples the study emphasizes the importance of using a comprehensive database combined with a detailed system for food registration in clinical and epidemiological studies. The present antioxidant database is therefore an essential research tool to further elucidate the potential health effects of phytochemical antioxidants in diet.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Monica Carlsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bente Halvorsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kari Holte</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Siv Bohn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Steinar Dragland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Sampson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carol Willey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Haruki Senoo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yuko Umezono</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chiho Sanada</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ingrid Barikmo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nega Berhe</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Walter Willett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Katherine Phillips</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Jacobs</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rune Blomhoff</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2010, 9:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-22T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-3</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-22T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/10">
        <title>A review of fatty acid profiles and antioxidant content in grass-fed and grain-fed beef</title>
        <description>Growing consumer interest in grass-fed beef products has raised a number of questions with regard to the perceived differences in nutritional quality between grass-fed and grain-fed cattle. Research spanning three decades suggests that grass-based diets can significantly improve the fatty acid (FA) composition and antioxidant content of beef, albeit with variable impacts on overall palatability. Grass-based diets have been shown to enhance total conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) (C18:2) isomers, trans vaccenic acid (TVA) (C18:1 t11), a precursor to CLA, and omega-3 (n-3) FAs on a g/g fat basis. While the overall concentration of total SFAs is not different between feeding regimens, grass-finished beef tends toward a higher proportion of cholesterol neutral stearic FA (C18:0), and less cholesterol-elevating SFAs such as myristic (C14:0) and palmitic (C16:0) FAs. Several studies suggest that grass-based diets elevate precursors for Vitamin A and E, as well as cancer fighting antioxidants such as glutathione (GT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity as compared to grain-fed contemporaries. Fat conscious consumers will also prefer the overall lower fat content of a grass-fed beef product. However, consumers should be aware that the differences in FA content will also give grass-fed beef a distinct grass flavor and unique cooking qualities that should be considered when making the transition from grain-fed beef. In addition, the fat from grass-finished beef may have a yellowish appearance from the elevated carotenoid content (precursor to Vitamin A).  It is also noted that grain-fed beef consumers may achieve similar intakes of both n-3 and CLA through the consumption of higher fat grain-fed portions.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Cynthia Daley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amber Abbott</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Doyle</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Glenn Nader</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stephanie Larson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2010, 9:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-10</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/5">
        <title>Apple phytochemicals and their health benefits</title>
        <description>Evidence suggests that a diet high in fruits and vegetables may decrease the risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease and cancer, and phytochemicals including phenolics, flavonoids and carotenoids from fruits and vegetables may play a key role in reducing chronic disease risk. Apples are a widely consumed, rich source of phytochemicals, and epidemiological studies have linked the consumption of apples with reduced risk of some cancers, cardiovascular disease, asthma, and diabetes. In the laboratory, apples have been found to have very strong antioxidant activity, inhibit cancer cell proliferation, decrease lipid oxidation, and lower cholesterol. Apples contain a variety of phytochemicals, including quercetin, catechin, phloridzin and chlorogenic acid, all of which are strong antioxidants. The phytochemical composition of apples varies greatly between different varieties of apples, and there are also small changes in phytochemicals during the maturation and ripening of the fruit. Storage has little to no effect on apple phytochemicals, but processing can greatly affect apple phytochemicals. While extensive research exists, a literature review of the health benefits of apples and their phytochemicals has not been compiled to summarize this work. The purpose of this paper is to review the most recent literature regarding the health benefits of apples and their phytochemicals, phytochemical bioavailability and antioxidant behavior, and the effects of variety, ripening, storage and processing on apple phytochemicals.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Jeanelle Boyer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rui Hai Liu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2004, 3:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-05-12T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-3-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-05-12T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/8">
        <title>Weight loss in individuals with metabolic syndrome given DASH diet counseling when provided a low sodium vegetable juice: a randomized controlled trial </title>
        <description>Background:
Metabolic syndrome, a constellation of metabolic risk factors for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, is one of the fastest growing disease entities in the world. Weight loss is thought to be a key to improving all aspects of metabolic syndrome. Research studies have suggested benefits from diets rich in vegetables and fruits in helping individuals reach and achieve healthy weights.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of a ready to serve vegetable juice as part of a calorie-appropriate Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet in an ethnically diverse population of people with Metabolic Syndrome on weight loss and their ability to meet vegetable intake recommendations, and on their clinical characteristics of metabolic syndrome (waist circumference, triglycerides, HDL, fasting blood glucose and blood pressure).A secondary goal was to examine the impact of the vegetable juice on associated parameters, including leptin, vascular adhesion markers, and markers of the oxidative defense system and of oxidative stress.
Methods:
A prospective 12 week, 3 group (0, 8, or 16 fluid ounces of low sodium vegetable juice) parallel arm randomized controlled trial. Participants were requested to limit their calorie intake to 1600 kcals for women and 1800 kcals for men and were educated on the DASH diet. A total of 81 (22 men &amp; 59 women) participants with Metabolic Syndrome were enrolled into the study. Dietary nutrient and vegetable intake, weight, height, leptin, metabolic syndrome clinical characteristics and related markers of endothelial and cardiovascular health were measured at baseline, 6-, and 12-weeks.
Results:
There were significant group by time interactions when aggregating both groups consuming vegetable juice (8 or 16 fluid ounces daily). Those consuming juice lost more weight, consumed more Vitamin C, potassium, and dietary vegetables than individuals who were in the group that only received diet counseling (p &lt; 0.05).
Conclusion:
The incorporation of vegetable juice into the daily diet can be a simple and effective way to increase the number of daily vegetable servings. Data from this study also suggest the potential of using a low sodium vegetable juice in conjunction with a calorie restricted diet to aid in weight loss in overweight individuals with metabolic syndrome.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Sonia Shenoy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Walker Poston</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rebecca Reeves</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandra Kazaks</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Roberta Holt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carl Keen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hsin Ju Chen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>C. Keith Haddock</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Barbara Winters</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chor San Khoo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>John Foreyt</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2010, 9:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-8</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/19">
        <title>Nutrition and cancer: A review of the evidence for an anti-cancer diet</title>
        <description>It has been estimated that 30&#8211;40 percent of all cancers can be prevented by lifestyle and dietary measures alone. Obesity, nutrient sparse foods such as concentrated sugars and refined flour products that contribute to impaired glucose metabolism (which leads to diabetes), low fiber intake, consumption of red meat, and imbalance of omega 3 and omega 6 fats all contribute to excess cancer risk. Intake of flax seed, especially its lignan fraction, and abundant portions of fruits and vegetables will lower cancer risk. Allium and cruciferous vegetables are especially beneficial, with broccoli sprouts being the densest source of sulforophane. Protective elements in a cancer prevention diet include selenium, folic acid, vitamin B-12, vitamin D, chlorophyll, and antioxidants such as the carotenoids (&#945;-carotene, &#946;-carotene, lycopene, lutein, cryptoxanthin). Ascorbic acid has limited benefits orally, but could be very beneficial intravenously. Supplementary use of oral digestive enzymes and probiotics also has merit as anticancer dietary measures. When a diet is compiled according to the guidelines here it is likely that there would be at least a 60&#8211;70 percent decrease in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancers, and even a 40&#8211;50 percent decrease in lung cancer, along with similar reductions in cancers at other sites. Such a diet would be conducive to preventing cancer and would favor recovery from cancer as well.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/3/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Michael Donaldson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2004, 3:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2004-10-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-3-19</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2004-10-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/2/1/7">
        <title>Vitamin C in human health and disease is still a mystery ? An overview</title>
        <description>Ascorbic acid is one of the important water soluble vitamins. It is essential for collagen, carnitine and neurotransmitters biosynthesis. Most plants and animals synthesize ascorbic acid for their own requirement. However, apes and humans can not synthesize ascorbic acid due to lack of an enzyme gulonolactone oxidase. Hence, ascorbic acid has to be supplemented mainly through fruits, vegetables and tablets. The current US recommended daily allowance (RDA) for ascorbic acid ranges between 100&#8211;120 mg/per day for adults. Many health benefits have been attributed to ascorbic acid such as antioxidant, anti-atherogenic, anti-carcinogenic, immunomodulator and prevents cold etc. However, lately the health benefits of ascorbic acid has been the subject of debate and controversies viz., Danger of mega doses of ascorbic acid? Does ascorbic acid act as a antioxidant or pro-oxidant ? Does ascorbic acid cause cancer or may interfere with cancer therapy? However, the Panel on dietary antioxidants and related compounds stated that the in vivo data do not clearly show a relationship between excess ascorbic acid intake and kidney stone formation, pro-oxidant effects, excess iron absorption. A number of clinical and epidemiological studies on anti-carcinogenic effects of ascorbic acid in humans did not show any conclusive beneficial effects on various types of cancer except gastric cancer. Recently, a few derivatives of ascorbic acid were tested on cancer cells, among them ascorbic acid esters showed promising anticancer activity compared to ascorbic acid. Ascorbyl stearate was found to inhibit proliferation of human cancer cells by interfering with cell cycle progression, induced apoptosis by modulation of signal transduction pathways. However, more mechanistic and human in vivo studies are needed to understand and elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the anti-carcinogenic property of ascorbic acid. Thus, though ascorbic acid was discovered in 17th century, the exact role of this vitamin/nutraceutical in human biology and health is still a mystery in view of many beneficial claims and controversies.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/2/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Kamatham Naidu</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2003, 2:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2003-08-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-2-7</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2003-08-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/7/1/2">
        <title>Nutritional therapies for mental health disorders</title>
        <description>According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4 out of the 10 leading causes of disability in the US and other developed countries are mental disorders. Major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) are among the most common mental disorders that currently plague numerous countries and have varying incidence rates from 26 percent in America to 4 percent in China. Though some of this difference may be attributable to the manner in which individual healthcare providers diagnose mental disorders, this noticeable distribution can be also explained by studies which show that a lack of certain dietary nutrients contribute to the development of mental disorders. Notably, essential vitamins, minerals, and omega-3 fatty acids are often deficient in the general population in America and other developed countries; and are exceptionally deficient in patients suffering from mental disorders. Studies have shown that daily supplements of vital nutrients often effectively reduce patients&apos; symptoms. Supplements that contain amino acids also reduce symptoms, because they are converted to neurotransmitters that alleviate depression and other mental disorders. Based on emerging scientific evidence, this form of nutritional supplement treatment may be appropriate for controlling major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and anxiety disorders, eating disorders, attention deficit disorder/attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADD/ADHD), addiction, and autism. The aim of this manuscript is to emphasize which dietary supplements can aid the treatment of the four most common mental disorders currently affecting America and other developed countries: major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD).Most antidepressants and other prescription drugs cause severe side effects, which usually discourage patients from taking their medications. Such noncompliant patients who have mental disorders are at a higher risk for committing suicide or being institutionalized. One way for psychiatrists to overcome this noncompliance is to educate themselves about alternative or complementary nutritional treatments. Although in the cases of certain nutrients, further research needs to be done to determine the best recommended doses of most nutritional supplements, psychiatrists can recommend doses of dietary supplements based on previous and current efficacious studies and then adjust the doses based on the results obtained.</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/7/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Shaheen Lakhan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Karen Vieira</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2008, 7:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-01-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-7-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/11">
        <title>Efficacy of a meal replacement diet plan compared to a food-based diet plan after a period of weight loss and weight maintenance: a randomized controlled trial</title>
        <description>Background:
Obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the United States. It is implicated in the development of a variety of chronic disease states and is associated with increased levels of inflammation and oxidative stress. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of Medifast&apos;s meal replacement program (MD) on body weight, body composition, and biomarkers of inflammation and oxidative stress among obese individuals following a period of weight loss and weight maintenance compared to a an isocaloric, food-based diet (FB).
Methods:
This 40-week randomized, controlled clinical trial included 90 obese adults with a body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 50 kg/m2, randomly assigned to one of two weight loss programs for 16 weeks and then followed for a 24-week period of weight maintenance. The dietary interventions consisted of Medifast&apos;s meal replacement program for weight loss and weight maintenance, or a self-selected, isocaloric, food-based meal plan.
Results:
Weight loss at 16 weeks was significantly better in the Medifast group (MD) versus the food-based group (FB) (12.3% vs. 6.9%), and while significantly more weight was regained during weight maintenance on MD versus FB, overall greater weight loss was achieved on MD versus FB. Significantly more of the MD participants lost [greater than or equal to]5% of their initial weight at week 16 (93% vs. 55%) and week 40 (62% vs. 30%). There was no difference in satiety observed between the two groups during the weight loss phase. Significant improvements in body composition were also observed in MD participants compared to FB at week 16 and week 40. At week 40, both groups experienced improvements in biochemical outcomes and other clinical indicators.
Conclusions:
Our data suggest that the meal replacement diet plan evaluated was an effective strategy for producing robust initial weight loss and for achieving improvements in a number of health-related parameters during weight maintenance, including inflammation and oxidative stress, two key factors more recently shown to underlie our most common chronic diseases.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01011491</description>
        <link>http://www.nutritionj.com/content/9/1/11</link>
                <dc:creator>Lisa Davis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Christopher Coleman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jessica Kiel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joni Rampolla</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tammy Hutchisen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Laura Ford</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Wayne Andersen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Hanlon-Mitola</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Nutrition Journal 2010, 9:11</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-03-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-2891-9-11</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Nutrition Journal</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-2891</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>9</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-03-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
